then is there no falsehood?
i wish i had paid more attention in my writing class last fall, which centered around the pursuit of truth and the struggle to define it. i've forgotten what all the great minds have said on the matter, so instead i've turned to my own patchy philosophy for clues to where, precisely, truth splits from fantasy or self-deception--and as you might have guessed, i've been utterly unsuccessful.
truth is supposed to be disengaged from deception, but i wonder how that works, considering that nothing has any meaning besides what we assign it. and to assign meaning, don't we have to deceive ourselves into believing that we matter, that our lives matter, that the world matters--when really, nothing matters at all?
in heart of darkness, marlow mentions the impossibility of conveying one's personal experience to someone else without damaging its truth. in the end, our truth, if we manage to uncover it, is nontransferable. "we live, as we dream--alone."